And isn’t such justice necessary to bring peace of mind to the victims of aggression so that true peace can prevail?
The point doesn’t arise for Roth and HRW, who not only are completely oblivious to this double standard, but in their Balkans efforts have worked closely with the perpetrators of the supreme crime in allegedly bringing justice to the lesser criminals.
HRW never produced a major report on the sanctions. And though HRW did point out that the deliberate starvation of civilian populations is a war crime, it never suggested that U. It may be argued, however, that if a war itself is illegal, then any military or civilian killings that follow from this crime cannot be defended on grounds that they are the unavoidable consequence of war;  but this is not the philosophy of HRW, which ignores that basic illegality.
We have members from all over the world who enjoy living naked, skinny dipping, and meeting others with this lifestyle.
Nudism is a fun, healthy, freeing and wholesome way for men and women to socialize and live without clothes.
But this principle should clearly apply to villains who commit the “supreme international crime,” and it was precisely such villains who were tried at Nuremberg .
Wouldn’t we want “justice” brought to aggressors to teach potential aggressors that such behavior doesn’t pay?
Naturism is a philosophy that values simplicity and increased harmony with nature.
Sign up now to contact hundreds of thousands of quality nudists/naturists!
There, HRW has treated the conflicts and their impact upon civilian populations as the direct consequences of cross-border aggression, and has held the ethnic Serb leadership in Belgrade to be uniquely responsible for them.
The entire first half of HRW’s Weighing the Evidence is devoted to a summary of the Office of the Prosecutor’s evidence that Belgrade provided financial, material, and personnel support to ethnic Serb combatants in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina—treating this support as clear-cut violations of the international law against aggression: “[H]ow Belgrade orchestrated the vicious wars in Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo,” as Weighing the Evidence author Sara Darehshori put it. HRW has never done the same in other theaters of armed conflict where it maintains an interest—say, documenting how Washington’s financial and material support “orchestrates” Israel’s 40-year-old military occupation of the Palestinian Territories or Israel’s cross-border attacks into Lebanon; and as already noted, U. crimes of aggression are treated with “neutrality.” But HRW-style neutrality disappears when it is dealing with U. targets such as Serbia, where HRW widens its human rights concerns beyond mere methods of combat to include “who started it” and the “accumulated evil of the whole.” In a closely related double standard—and point of illogic—throughout their coverage of the Balkans conflicts, and in close accord with the position of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY or Tribunal), Roth and HRW demanded that the villains (Serbs) must be brought to justice if a true peace is to prevail. This was allegedly required to help deter future villainy and because the victims need the consolation of justice.
Content Header .feed_item_answer_user .anon_user.logged_out .
Welcome to the first, most-trusted and largest site for nudist/naturist friends in the world!
.pass_color_to_child_links a.u-inline.u-margin-left--xs.u-margin-right--sm.u-width--100.u-flex-align-self--center.u-flex-justify--between.u-serif-font-main--regular.js-wf-loaded .u-serif-font-main--regular.amp-page .u-serif-font-main--regular.u-hover-bg--black-transparent.web_page .u-hover-bg--black-transparent:hover.